This week there are 4 meetings with a focus on “standards”!

🏗️ ISO 13399-61

It starts with the manufacturer identifiers. In part 61 of ISO 13399, we look at the small but extremely important letter abbreviations for tool suppliers when exchanging data. They are particularly important because they are part of the unique referencing (article no. + manufacturer ID). They are also required in separator-coding. The key question now is how such identifiers can be uniquely assigned worldwide for all companies involved in tool data exchange.

🔍 ISO 13399 classification

Yes, it really is true: ISO 13399 does not have a proper classification. This is primarily required by the “receiving systems”. The ad hoc session (chaired by CIMSOURCE) will now focus on the central question: Can a classification be realized by combining GTC and DIN at ISO level? If so, this would mean a clear approximation to DIN 4000!

📋 DIN 4000-191

“Is the position of the MCS practicable for clamping elements with serrations?” We deal with these and similar questions in Part 191 of DIN 4000. It is clear that DIN 4000 already deals with the peripheral issues of tool data exchange. Nevertheless, it is an important topic, especially for clamping device manufacturers.

🏗️ ISO 13399-90

ISO is still more about the basics. In what form do I provide my tool data? I have created my P21 file with all the geometric properties of the tool. And how do I now link it with the corresponding step file and the 3D graphic? This will be regulated in Part 90 of ISO 13399 in the future.

… and we’ll continue next week:

🤝 Technology working group

Experts in data exchange meet regularly in the revitalized technology working group, focusing primarily on the practical implementation of the standards. For example, they discuss the consistency of ISO symbols in DIN 4000, the avoidance of changes to the meaning of characteristics and quite normal problems in everyday data exchange.

🏗️ ISO 13399-6

Part 6 of ISO 13399 deals with tool assemblies similar to DIN 4000-180. This session will focus on 3D models and the use of the STEP AP242 format. In recent weeks, several tests have been carried out by system houses regarding the import and export of step files, which will now be compiled and discussed.

👉 How do you deal with the further development of standards? Does ISO finally need a classification? We look forward to the exchange in the comments!